When facilitated communication is just wishful thinking
This report summarises the problems with FC (facilitated communication) and it is cases such as those described in the link that have led to organisations such as Research Autism describing it as a potentially hazardous intervention. Certainly it can be and it explains the approach taken by families such as Carly Fleischmann who has only ever typed independently.
However, there are non-verbal adults now typing independently, Lucy Blackman for example, who state that without having a period in which they were supported physically they would never have learned to type. Certainly the movement difficulties experienced by those with autism (particularly non-verbal) are poorly understood. I've noticed when working on typing with Archie that some days he can type completely independently and other days he needs his arm supported. Our typed communication doesn't extend much beyond asking to go on a train or to a beach so the issue of competence has yet to arise (he has demonstrated in multiple ways that he is quite capable of asking to go to the beach or on a train).
Portia Iversen who promoted the Informative Pointing Method emphasises the need to move towards independent typing even though physical support may be needed initially in order to avoid these sorts of controversies. As technology advances this becomes easier. Archie, for example appears to find typing on an iPad far easier than using a keyboard. He also finds rearranging letters from a selection on a touch screen easier than any form of typing although he may need some verbal support to stay on task 'what's next?' etc. With apps and the iPad can explore typing as a means of communication, while encouraging independence and hopefully not running into too many issues around proving competence.







